can use gpedit but Windows non-Pro can't.), while others are a matter of paying for a service rather than a thing. Some segmentation is a bit extreme (Windows Pro etc. Some product variation exists on purpose, while others are mostly just as a side-effect from the production yields. Take sensors, silicon, power systems etc. Some differences are based on binning and calibration for example. It isn't different, but it's also not a clear comparison. Sony and Panasonic cameras (and perhaps other manufacturers) are running Linux (and release some of the third party source code they include in their products, but the amount of reverse engineering that has been done on those camera's software.Ĭanon uses a custom RTOS (DryOS), and lots of work has been done to extend the existing Canon firmware to enhance its capabilities (Magic Lantern and CHDK), but as far as I know fully open software for these devices doesn't exist.Ĭamera capabilities these days are highly software dependent, and the functionality of dedicated cameras is held back by subpar software development practices and a lack of pressure to make things better. Camera software is an area that is frustratingly closed off, and where manufacturers regularly differentiate new/more expensive cameras with firmware differences: subject detection, auto focus, drive modes (pre-capture, higher frame rates, etc), file format support (HEIC, compressed raw, colorspaces), ui features (how custom modes work, menu systems, etc).Ĭompetition in this space driven by a provider that doesn't have a motive to convince users to buy the next new camera (ie: open source software) would be very useful to users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |